MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130723
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 17 '18 at 22:37
Run Duration277 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 93.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 425
56% 420 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.1% Above average
Lighting 66.4
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 69.4
54% 68.3 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 63
Splatting 54.7
51% 63.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 149 114 128 59 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 420
Write 191
Mixed 192
SusWrite 105
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 22.9
94% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 110
99% 157 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 76%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 126 125 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 127
Write 126
Mixed 82
SusWrite 125
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 88%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 47 51 48 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 140
Write 51.5
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 49.1
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 86%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
492GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 72.3
Write 64
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 97.2
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
131% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
900GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 74
Write 74.8
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 68.2
46% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 59%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 130 128 130 129 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 84
Write 84.5
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 129
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.7
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $657
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback