PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P9X79 WS (all builds) |
Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180507 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Oct 17 '18 at 08:52 |
Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
87.3%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.5%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial M4 512GB-$74
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 222 215 217 251 185 MB/s
|
71.8%
Very good
|
|||
Crucial MX300 750GB-$160
185GB free
Firmware: R011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 316 299 300 305 303 MB/s
|
77.8%
Very good
|
|||
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
712GB free
Firmware: 1L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 103 103 107 107 MB/s
|
57.9%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 992015 (997015) 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
122%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 106x |
Core i7-4930KIntel $90Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 81x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 60x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 27x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $782 |