Asus GL502VT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus GL502VT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL502VT
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '18 at 04:35
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 164
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 543
49% 413 Pts
64-Core 544
34% 544 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Asus(1043 1140) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9793
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 33
Parallax 34.2
12% 27.4 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 36.3
26% 31.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,624
Write 53.8
Mixed 110
332% 1,596 MB/s
4K Read 575
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 6.5
881% 195 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 0420 F4-2400C16-16GRS 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 20.9
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL502VT Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL502VT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback