Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus Z9PE-D8 WS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory	59.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150107
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '18 at 01:20
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 1,097 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 60.3 1-Core 46.1 2-Core 94.3 41% 66.9 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 394 32% 278 Pts	64-Core 1,289 80% 1,289 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B 1341) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 1.47 1% 1.34 fps	MRender 1.19 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.17 1% 1.05 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 304 282 289 290 289 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 458 Write 432 Mixed 387 SusWrite 281 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 30.8 96% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 261 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 237 181% 245 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow KC400 1TB-$380 709 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 26GB free Firmware: SAFM001B SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 125 161 180 181 181 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.7% Above average	Read 250 Write 55.8 Mixed 215 SusWrite 159 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 23.4 79% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 62 82% 149 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 110%
Adata XPG SX900 512GB-$189 1,547 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 16GB free Firmware: 5.0.7a SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 269 243 231 247 234 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	55.1% Above average	Read 395 Write 267 Mixed 267 SusWrite 236 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 17.3 58% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 99.7 DQ Mixed 114 96% 143 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 69%
OCZ Agility2 120GB 281 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 103GB free Firmware: 1.11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 79 77 78 77 79 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 150 Write 113 Mixed 132 SusWrite 80 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 22 76% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 124 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 111 86% 118 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 54%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 35GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 143 143 144 145 145 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	70.7% Very good	Read 105 Write 101 Mixed 71.8 SusWrite 141 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 44GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 106 106 106 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 89.3 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 105 63% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 8x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	75.5% Very good	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 29.6 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 5.4 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 221 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 89%

Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	19x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	15x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	14x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	10x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x

RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples	7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples	7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16