Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 90% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA (all builds)
Memory	59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160325
Uptime	4.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '18 at 23:55
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 88.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 255 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 447 8-Core 710 71% 579 Pts	64-Core 701 43% 701 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Titan X Pascal-$286 8,692 User benchmarks, average bench 121% Nvidia(10DE 119A) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 416.34 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	120% Outstanding	Lighting 167 Reflection 179 Parallax 182 136% 176 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 163 Splatting 111 104% 129 fps
Poor: 108% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 132%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 215GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1027 960 952 1037 898 849 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	221% Outstanding	Read 1,811 Write 1,231 Mixed 660 SusWrite 954 259% 1,164 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 124 4K Mixed 50.2 190% 71.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1045 DQ Write 398 DQ Mixed 446 402% 630 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 221% Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 83GB free Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 177 182 203 196 194 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	73% Very good	Read 314 Write 294 Mixed 268 SusWrite 190 60% 266 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 73.1 4K Mixed 32.9 122% 44.4 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 252 190% 255 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 128GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 176 181 203 196 194 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 353 Write 361 Mixed 297 SusWrite 189 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 71.1 4K Mixed 36 117% 43 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 234 DQ Mixed 249 189% 254 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB-$351 1,197 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.9% Very good	MC Read 26 MC Write 28.2 MC Mixed 23.8 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 17 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 23.2 66% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 172%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $160Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	59x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $250Bench 199%, 40,327 samples	42x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	32x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	39x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	39x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $78Bench 85%, 31,641 samples	21x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,020

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16