Biostar GF8100 M2+ SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar GF8100 M2+ SE  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100310
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 16 '18 at 19:13
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Memory 80.3
1-Core 66.5
2-Core 131
58% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 133
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 134
9% 134 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8100 / nForce 720a
Biostar(1565 1408) 256MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3
Parallax 0.7
0% 1.77 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
0% 1.97 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 0%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$19
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 88 84 95 95 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 108
Write 106
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 88.6
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 59%
WD WD1600YS-01SHB1 165GB-$90
143GB free
Firmware: 20.06C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 55 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 57
Mixed 47
SusWrite 55
40% 54 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 35%
Samsung SP1614C 160GB-$98
149GB free
Firmware: SW100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 57 57 56 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 55
Write 62.2
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 57.4
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 32%
ZALMAN External HDD 1TB
549GB free, PID 2028
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 28 23 28 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 28.4
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 27.6
36% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
26.6% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 9.8
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 80
50% 80 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GF8100 M2+ SE Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar GF8100 M2+ SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 7% - Terrible Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback