| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 7.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Q35M-S2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090420 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 16 '18 at 15:42 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 73% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
42.3%
Average
|
35% 49.8 Pts
|
14% 108 Pts
|
7% 109 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7750
Gigabyte(1458 2551) 1GB
CLim: 880 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.2.1
|
7.69%
Terrible
|
7% 10.7 fps
|
9% 10.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 99 42 36 34 43 MB/s
|
23.5%
Poor
|
21% 93.5 MB/s
|
42% 13.7 MB/s
|
9% 13.1 MB/s
|
|
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154
87GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 79 79 79 79 MB/s
|
43.5%
Average
|
42% 57 MB/s
|
117% 0.9 MB/s
| |
|
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 14 14 14 13 MB/s
|
7.08%
Terrible
|
17% 13.7 MB/s
|
14% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
16.6%
Very poor
|
15% 5.17 GB/s
|
14% 4.73 GB/s
|
36% 110 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-Q35M-S2 Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q35M-S2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Quad Q9450Intel $110Bench 49%, 5,335 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 1x |
| GeForce 8400 GSNvidiaBench 1%, 18,254 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $150 |