Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5200 APU 10,450 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	29.4% Poor	Memory 39.2 1-Core 31 2-Core 62 27% 44.1 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 113 15% 114 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 29.4% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400 Graphics 65 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 3802) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.95% Terrible	Lighting 2.17 Reflection 4.62 Parallax 2.81 2% 3.2 fps	MRender 2.95 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 3.35 2% 2.74 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.95% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 240GB-$181 1,826 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 33GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 107 108 104 123 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 359 Write 131 Mixed 202 SusWrite 112 44% 201 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 26.6 91% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 155 115% 153 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GB 19,744 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.83 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.2 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 206 19% 206 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
A6-5200 APUAMDBench 30%, 10,450 samples	3x
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	2x
Radeon HD 8400 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 65 samples	1x
Radeon HD 8330 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 49 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 12,200 samples	1x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 44,908 samples	1x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16