Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX100 S3P (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3009-B1
Memory	16.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121218
Uptime	3.8 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '18 at 07:03
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	71.9% Very good	Memory 82.1 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 180 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 359 48% 358 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 36F7) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9764 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	2.98% Terrible	Lighting 3.33 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 3 3% 3.16 fps	MRender 3.57 Gravity 3.63 Splatting 5.17 4% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.98% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 165 137 151 144 149 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	74.4% Very good	Read 259 Write 244 Mixed 232 SusWrite 164 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 69.6 4K Mixed 43.9 145% 49.2 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 196 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 74.4% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 746GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 193 180 197 191 199 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 197 Write 153 Mixed 81.9 SusWrite 192 114% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 239GB free Firmware: FJK3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 83 88 88 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 84.2 Write 86.1 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 86.4 57% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965525-116.A00LF 9965525-116.A00LF Samsung M391B5173QH0-YK0 20GB 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.1% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.2 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 13.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	Latency 76.8 52% 76.8 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E3-1220 V2Intel $305Bench 69%, 3,748 samples	23x
Xeon E3-1230 V2Intel $266Bench 70%, 8,235 samples	2x
Pentium G640Intel $30Bench 48%, 3,040 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	5x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	3x

SSD
M6e PCIe 256GBPlextor $50Bench 112%, 744 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
MX100 512GBCrucial $200Bench 88%, 31,545 samples	2x

RAM
M391B5273DH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 182 samples	6x
HMT351U7CFR8A-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 57%, 50 samples	4x
M391B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 32%, 189 samples	2x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $355

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16