HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Bh
Memory5.4 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '18 at 00:59
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 122
56% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 285
31% 245 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 480-$500
Nvidia(10DE 075F) 1.5GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 23.7
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 26.1
19% 28.7 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 27.4
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 52 62 83 82 90 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.3% Poor
Read 206
Write 181
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 87.6
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 8.2
38% 12.2 MB/s
DQ Read 46.8
DQ Write 18
DQ Mixed 39.9
28% 34.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
418GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 75 85 96 99 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 38.8
Write 50.8
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 83.5
38% 51.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:01 98 ACR256X64D3U16C11 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 655 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback