Asrock B75M-GL R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B75M-GL R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20120822
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 15 '18 at 21:04
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	41%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	70.9% Very good	Memory 86.8 1-Core 103 2-Core 201 75% 130 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 406 45% 354 Pts	64-Core 395 24% 395 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Lighting 48.6 Reflection 32.8 Parallax 40.2 40% 40.5 fps	MRender 39.1 Gravity 43.6 Splatting 38.3 33% 40.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 302 301 296 283 370 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 260 Write 259 Mixed 240 SusWrite 322 61% 270 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 32.3 112% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 360 272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 124%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67 19,126 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 153 154 152 138 145 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 146 Write 137 Mixed 62.6 SusWrite 148 90% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB 205 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	57.3% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.6 57% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M-GL R2.0 Builds (Compare 228 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B75M-GL R2.0 - $76

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	34x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	31x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	25x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	7x

RAM
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	5x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $163

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16