Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100820
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '18 at 22:35
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3430 4,096 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 96.8 1-Core 95.9 2-Core 175 74% 123 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 345 46% 342 Pts	64-Core 342 21% 342 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6150) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.16 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 25.2 Parallax 33.8 28% 31.1 fps	MRender 37.4 Gravity 32.6 Splatting 31.6 27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 13 63 46 30 85 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40% Below average	Read 192 Write 102 Mixed 138 SusWrite 63.7 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 52.8 4K Mixed 13.2 69% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 126 109% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24 2,225 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 87GB free Firmware: 3.05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 53 54 54 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	30.1% Below average	Read 51.2 Write 50 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 53.4 35% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 15.7 50% 17.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 13.9 36% 12.8 GB/s	Latency 51.1 78% 51.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H55M-S2H Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2H

CPU
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	53x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	50x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	48x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	50x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	169x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	81x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $73

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16