| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
| Graphics | 1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Toshiba Satellite C660D (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA PWWBE |
| Memory | 4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120110 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 14 '18 at 20:43 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
|
28.1%
Poor
|
26% 36.1 Pts
|
5% 37.5 Pts
|
2% 39.1 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 6320
Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
1.07%
Terrible
|
1% 1.5 fps
|
1% 1.42 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 103 47 47 49 50 MB/s
|
34.3%
Below average
|
33% 147 MB/s
|
51% 15.5 MB/s
|
58% 92.1 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.3%
Very poor
|
14% 4.93 GB/s
|
8% 2.83 GB/s
|
25% 160 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite C660D Builds (Compare 53 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite C660D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples | 15x |
| E-240AMDBench 24%, 462 samples | 13x |
| E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples | 9x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples | 33x |
| Mobility Radeon HD 4250ATIBench 1%, 11,054 samples | 8x |
| Radeon HD 6320AMDBench 1%, 8,182 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 28% - Poor | Total price: $120 |