PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130712 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Oct 14 '18 at 16:46 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
79%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.9.1
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 295 127 133 131 122 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
59GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 46 39 46 48 48 MB/s
|
29.3%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Expansion 1TB
26GB free
Firmware: 060E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
61GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 66 63 75 70 86 MB/s
|
46.6%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
61.1%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 458x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 199x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 174x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 118x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 88x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 73x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $492 |