Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_PC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK B85M-E
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '18 at 15:16
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 110
2-Core 215
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 577
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 46.1
Parallax 39.9
38% 44.1 fps
MRender 40.6
Gravity 40.6
Splatting 36.6
32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 287 290 293 292 295 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 470
Mixed 345
SusWrite 310
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 45.4
170% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 97.7
DQ Mixed 140
112% 160 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
41GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 79 76 78 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 91.8
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 78.5
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 88%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
207GB free
Firmware: VT100-49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 68 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 66.5
Write 69.8
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 67.3
45% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 38%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
866GB free, PID a00d
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 103 104 104 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 104
115% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
19GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 2.8 8 8 7.3 8.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.7
Write 0.2
Mixed 8
SusWrite 6.4
11% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.3
222% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 18%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
14GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 8.1 9 8.4 8.9 9.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 19.5
Write 7.8
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 7.6
16% 13 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.4
212% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.6
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_PC Builds (Compare 2,386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $222
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback