Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 16:21
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 131
2-Core 259
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 880
85% 699 Pts
64-Core 1135
70% 1135 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 107
Parallax 89.4
75% 96.1 fps
MRender 84.5
Gravity 81.7
Splatting 84.2
68% 83.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1147 1172 598 602 603 601 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 2402
Write 1,968
Mixed 1,399
SusWrite 787
365% 1,639 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 51.8
170% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 90
DQ Mixed 107
80% 106 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 202%
Great: 340%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
101GB free
Firmware: 526ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 109 109 108 103 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 407
Write 117
Mixed 184
SusWrite 106
45% 204 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 27.9
100% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 81.3
DQ Mixed 97.9
73% 98.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58%
Great: 87%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 100 100 100 100 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 125
Write 115
Mixed 106
SusWrite 99.2
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 85%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
4TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 160 159 160 160 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66% Good
Read 162
Write 162
Mixed 120
SusWrite 157
203% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.5% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 20.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback