Asus P8H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H61  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110503
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 15:51
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-2400-$95
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.7% Above average
1-Core 86.7
2-Core 172
61% 129 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 338
46% 338 Pts
64-Core 335
22% 335 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 11.2
3% 12.1 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 7.2
3% 9.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 29 11 82 73 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.3% Poor
Read 223
Write 191
Mixed 105
SusWrite 77
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 8.8
50% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 23.7
DQ Mixed 21
16% 21.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 51%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
399GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 127 127 121 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 105
Write 131
Mixed 64.8
SusWrite 125
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 77%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
9.94% Terrible
Read 32
Write 4.5
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 3.5
12% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.8
115% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.94%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 16.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8H61 Builds (Compare 994 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H61 - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $478
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $278Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $195Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $219
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $618SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $66SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback