Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	84.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H270M-Gaming3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170706
Uptime	7.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '18 at 14:07
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 74 1-Core 108 2-Core 208 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 382 33% 280 Pts	64-Core 425 26% 425 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.9% Excellent	Lighting 106 Reflection 113 Parallax 95.6 87% 105 fps	MRender 97.8 Gravity 99 Splatting 100 81% 99 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK10D7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 12 64 62 50 33 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 441 Write 153 Mixed 120 SusWrite 44.3 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 56.7 4K Mixed 30.4 121% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 19.4 DQ Mixed 14.5 45% 106 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 100%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$40 18,782 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 692GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 135 138 137 139 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 54 Write 75.2 Mixed 31 SusWrite 137 54% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.2 42% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial UDIMM DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB-$29 2,562 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	MC Read 13 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.7 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 7.2 21% 7.33 GB/s	Latency 92.5 43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	35x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	34x
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
S3 512G 512GBSandiskBench 96%, 10,855 samples	5x
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	4x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	5x
KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GBKingstonBench 82%, 206 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $240

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16