User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardPEGATRON IPXSB-H61
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '18 at 13:18
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 88
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 120
58% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 205
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 23
56% 23 fps
Poor: 16% Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1C0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 257
Write 197
Mixed 24
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 33.9
4K Mixed 17.4
69% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 74.3
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 0.5
37% 86.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41
120GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 91 92 91 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 101
Write 31.5
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 91.9
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-400.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.7
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback