Medion H77H2-EM

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Medion H77H2-EM (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H77H2-EM
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120411
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 13 '18 at 01:52
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 101 2-Core 185 70% 122 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 390 42% 333 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1642 3A98) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 448 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.53 Reflection 3.08 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.53 fps	MRender 3.1 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 2.61 2% 2.69 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 63 60 73 71 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 447 Write 262 Mixed 332 SusWrite 105 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 76 4K Mixed 34.7 128% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 33.9 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 51.2 46% 67.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 454GB free Firmware: CC4G SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 162 169 163 163 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 169 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 165 106% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 7,510 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 13.1 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Medion H77H2-EM

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	163x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	5x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
C400 RealSSD 64GBMicronBench 54%, 411 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x

RAM
M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 4x4GBNanyaBench 56%, 702 samples	35x
M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 830B M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 830B M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 830B M2X2G64CB88G7N-DG 12GBUnknownBench 54%, 163 samples	27x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 4x4GBNanyaBench 48%, 550 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $547

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16