| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Huananzhi X79 PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 61.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180906 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 12 '18 at 19:49 |
| Run Duration | 106 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
80.1%
Excellent
|
71% 118 Pts
|
62% 514 Pts
|
68% 1,102 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.2%
Above average
|
51% 63.9 fps
|
51% 63.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
|
114%
Outstanding
|
130% 45.4 GB/s
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
65% 61.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79 PLUS Builds (Compare 7 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Huananzhi X79 PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples | 5x |
| Xeon E5-2690 v2Intel $142Bench 71%, 1,083 samples | 1x |
| Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 1x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $821 |