Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H87 Performance  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131211
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 18:19
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4790-$308
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 0.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
13.9% Very poor
SC Int 55.7
SC Float 44.4
SC Mixed 28
34% 42.7 Pts
QC Int 62.5
QC Float 49.8
QC Mixed 54.7
13% 55.7 Pts
MC Int 102
MC Float 94.1
MC Mixed 87.5
14% 94.6 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Lighting 13
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 11.2
4% 12.3 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 7.1
5% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$190
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 277 302 301 296 292 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 495
Write 446
Mixed 295
SusWrite 303
86% 385 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 32.2
109% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 122
95% 132 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 119%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 122 121 127 127 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 116
Write 102
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 123
68% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 86%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 139 140 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 154
Write 149
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 138
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 134 135 134 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 141
Write 128
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 133
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.8% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 5.9
22% 7.63 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 67%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 930 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $898
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback