Medion ERAZER X5301 G/C123

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemMedion ERAZER X5301 G/C123  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151120
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 17:27
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-6700-$320
1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.2% Very good
SC Int 94.1
SC Float 104
SC Mixed 97.9
79% 98.6 Pts
QC Int 349
QC Float 360
QC Mixed 349
80% 353 Pts
MC Int 557
MC Float 609
MC Mixed 571
87% 579 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$360
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 288
Parallax 311
96% 304 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 286
Splatting 226
101% 236 fps
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 110%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT2101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 53 55 43 43 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 472
Write 71.3
Mixed 108
SusWrite 51.3
38% 176 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 22
82% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 24.3
DQ Mixed 44.8
47% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 53%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
301GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 125 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 163
Write 166
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 125
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 106%
Generic- Multi-Card 4GB
4GB free, PID 0158
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.9 5.1 4.9 5.3 5.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 6
Mixed 7
SusWrite 5.1
9% 7.08 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.6
88% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 9%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 16GB
4GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 6.2 4.1 4.6 4.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
7.06% Terrible
Read 21
Write 10.7
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 5
15% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2
106% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.06%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 74.3
54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 43%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ERAZER X5301 G/C123 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Medion ERAZER X5301 G/C123

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $320
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback