User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 6.77%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
8 days ago, 8 days ago.
MotherboardTimi TM1613
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 14:02
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.77% Terrible
SC Int 10.9
SC Float 11.1
SC Mixed 11.6
9% 11.2 Pts
QC Int 28.7
QC Float 31.7
QC Mixed 31.6
7% 30.7 Pts
MC Int 28.1
MC Float 31.4
MC Mixed 30.6
4% 30 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 6.77%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Device(1D72 1602) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
2.51% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 6.5
2% 11.5 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 9.8
3% 7.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.51%
Great: 8%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 283 293 297 294 296 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 473
Write 297
Mixed 280
SusWrite 288
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 16.9
58% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 89.8
DQ Mixed 110
81% 107 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 142%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 19%
Great: 40%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i5-8600K $260AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback