HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics96.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory10.3 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 13:33
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5550
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.5% Good
SC Int 71.1
SC Float 76.7
SC Mixed 74.2
59% 74 Pts
QC Int 275
QC Float 293
QC Mixed 288
65% 286 Pts
MC Int 678
MC Float 726
MC Mixed 705
105% 703 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$319
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Lighting 296
Reflection 272
Parallax 317
94% 295 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 276
Splatting 212
98% 229 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 109%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$48
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 137 139 138 137 128 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.7% Above average
Read 228
Write 200
Mixed 206
SusWrite 136
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 32.8
99% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 180
141% 194 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$99
148GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 122 122 116 112 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 581
Write 326
Mixed 334
SusWrite 119
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 35.4
121% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 538
392% 515 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 235%
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$48
238GB free
Firmware: R0427ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 138 138 137 140 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.5% Above average
Read 229
Write 203
Mixed 209
SusWrite 138
44% 195 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 33.6
101% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 180
141% 194 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
474GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 125 128 131 131 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 141
Write 131
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 130
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$95
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 91 93 97 98 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 132
Write 100
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 94.3
71% 96.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.4
144% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8KTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8KTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8KTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8KTF25664AZ-1G4M1 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 5.8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 57.9
69% 57.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $78
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $319Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $152Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback