Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 13:20
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69.2% Good
SC Int 95.8
SC Float 98.1
SC Mixed 96.3
77% 96.7 Pts
QC Int 336
QC Float 362
QC Mixed 357
80% 351 Pts
MC Int 357
MC Float 362
MC Mixed 368
54% 362 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti-$362
PNY(196E 1000) 2GB
CLim: 1222 MHz, MLim: 1507 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 83.2
Parallax 128
33% 102 fps
MRender 83.3
Gravity 115
Splatting 46.9
36% 81.6 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35%
Great: 41%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Drevo X1 SSD 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1222A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 5 28 13 33 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 484
Write 363
Mixed 101
SusWrite 24.5
53% 243 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 8.4
17% 4.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 96%
WD WD3200BUCT-63TWBY0 320GB
151GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 69 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
40% Average
Read 70
Write 71.3
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 69.2
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40%
Great: 49%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$35
41GB free
Firmware: 13.01A13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 47 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 45.2
Write 45.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 46.1
32% 42.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
30.1% Below average
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 63.7
63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 50%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $175
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback