User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardPEGATRON H36QR
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100629
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 12:38
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3 M 380-$200
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
28.1% Poor
SC Int 56.9
SC Float 55.7
SC Mixed 56.2
45% 56.3 Pts
QC Int 124
QC Float 132
QC Mixed 115
28% 124 Pts
MC Int 137
MC Float 147
MC Mixed 146
22% 143 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 34%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500
Device(1B0A 2055) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
1.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 5.4
2% 6.63 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 5.3
1% 3.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.52%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$121
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB3ZC61H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 37 31 45 31 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 39.8
Write 30.5
Mixed 20
SusWrite 33.7
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown M471B5673FH0-CF8 80CE M471B5673EH1-CF8 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
23.3% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10.3
24% 8.3 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback