ADD TO PC
BUILD

Notebook P65_67RSRP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	78.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Notebook P65_67RSRP (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook P65_67RSRP
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161026
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '18 at 12:24
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 100 2-Core 190 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 530 53% 432 Pts	64-Core 513 32% 513 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Clevo(1558 6B04) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Lighting 97.6 Reflection 114 Parallax 88.5 80% 100 fps	MRender 80.3 Gravity 92.6 Splatting 101 76% 91.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 82%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,393 Write 1,576 Mixed 830 351% 1,600 MB/s	4K Read 49.9 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 68.7 239% 87.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,091 DQ Write 603 DQ Mixed 726 572% 807 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB 11,708 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 208GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 91 92 93 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 88.6 Write 82.6 Mixed 20.8 SusWrite 91 51% 70.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 166GB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 172 173 171 173 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 121 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 170 101% 138 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBR 1x16GB 690 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 15.4 MC Mixed 12.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 12.3 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 72.9 55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P65_67RSRP Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 47%

Yacht

Desktop

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

System: Notebook P65_67RSRP

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	105x
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	69x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	36x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	15x

SSD
SD8SN8U256G1122 256GBSandiskBench 77%, 2,469 samples	8x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	6x
Savage 960GBHyperX $397Bench 90%, 1,581 samples	5x

RAM
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	13x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 5,327 samples	8x
CM4B8G2J2133A15S 2x8GBCorsairBench 72%, 105 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback