Acer Predator PH517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 132%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics95.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
7 days ago, 7 days ago.
SystemAcer Predator PH517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Cayman_CFS
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 11:54
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
SC Int 120
SC Float 128
SC Mixed 126
100% 124 Pts
QC Int 423
QC Float 458
QC Mixed 446
100% 442 Pts
MC Int 892
MC Float 1087
MC Mixed 963
146% 981 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1243) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.92
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Lighting 290
Reflection 286
Parallax 287
89% 288 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 279
Splatting 218
99% 232 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 103%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1498 1375 1514 1483 1435 1352 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,995
Write 1,670
Mixed 1039
SusWrite 1,443
396% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 81.8
4K Mixed 49.5
169% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 670
DQ Write 488
DQ Mixed 556
422% 571 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 286%
Great: 344%
External USB3.0 64GB
59GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 151 157 153 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.3% Below average
Read 208
Write 144
Mixed 135
SusWrite 155
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 11.1
47% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 30.3
DQ Mixed 17
28% 56.3 MB/s
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
858GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 19.8
Write 27
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 22.9
21% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.3
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 71%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
3TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 9.2 11 18 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 36
Write 34
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 16.8
39% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
112% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 58%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 18 11 21 21 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 34.2
Mixed 29
SusWrite 16.8
38% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled
79.7% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 25.1
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 23.1
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 89%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Predator PH517-51 Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Acer Predator PH517-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback