Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (95%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N2600 2,255 User benchmarks, average bench 22% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Memory 18.6 1-Core 4.4 2-Core 6.2 8% 9.74 Pts	4-Core 9.9 8-Core 10 1% 9.95 Pts	64-Core 11.2 1% 11.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB 4,670 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: GT001M SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 36 36 30 26 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Read 31.1 Write 36.1 Mixed 21 SusWrite 28.4 22% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 86% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 46%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 32GB 4,876 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 12GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.9 3.7 4.9 3.8 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	3.83% Terrible	Read 15 Write 6.2 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 4.1 10% 8.75 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 19% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 3.83% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664HZ-1G4M 1x2GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	6.69% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.1 7% 2.5 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.8 SC Mixed 0.1 1% 0.33 GB/s	Latency 331 12% 331 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 6.69% Great: 11%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Atom N2800IntelBench 26%, 451 samples	1x

GPU
Graphics Media Accelerator 3600IntelBench 0%, 1,010 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5773DH0-CH9 1x2GBSamsungBench 23%, 2,805 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16