Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics72% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110527
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 10:38
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
26.3% Poor
SC Int 35.5
SC Float 40.6
SC Mixed 48
33% 41.4 Pts
QC Int 149
QC Float 123
QC Mixed 117
30% 130 Pts
MC Int 142
MC Float 134
MC Mixed 124
20% 134 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$230
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
72% Very good
Lighting 225
Reflection 201
Parallax 215
68% 214 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 206
Splatting 169
75% 175 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$50
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 279 279 278 278 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 371
Write 367
Mixed 333
SusWrite 280
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 39.9
116% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 120
91% 121 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 127%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$14
60GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 80 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 79.8
Write 76.8
Mixed 53
SusWrite 78.7
53% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$14
76GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 98 102 100 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 99.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 100
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.5% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 6.8
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 63%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $690
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $319Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $152Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback