Acer AOD255E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.07%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemAcer AOD255E  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE02_PT_E
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 10:32
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom N455
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
4.07% Terrible
SC Int 15.6
SC Float 4.9
SC Mixed 8.3
8% 9.6 Pts
QC Int 28.5
QC Float 11.6
QC Mixed 16.9
4% 19 Pts
MC Int 28.4
MC Float 11.3
MC Mixed 16.4
3% 18.7 Pts
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.07%
Great: 5%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5075GSX 500GB-$130
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 28 14 28 43 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 60.9
Write 63.9
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 33.1
33% 45.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled
8.93% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.43 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 29%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical AOD255E Builds (Compare 0 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Acer AOD255E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback