User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.26%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemJumper EZpad
Motherboard$INET $J1062
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171024
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 07:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.26% Terrible
SC Int 21.2
SC Float 12.5
SC Mixed 17.2
14% 17 Pts
QC Int 39.3
QC Float 28.5
QC Mixed 35.3
8% 34.4 Pts
MC Int 44.3
MC Float 24.7
MC Mixed 18.1
4% 29 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.26%
Great: 16%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 5.2
1% 4.07 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 3.6
1% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Hynix 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.46% Terrible
MC Read 2.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.03 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 1
3% 1.03 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback