PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME (all builds) |
Memory | 13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20150303 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 12 '18 at 07:37 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | IND-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
86.5%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 281 257 293 283 285 MB/s
|
90.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 164 164 167 167 167 MB/s
|
96.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$75
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 147 148 151 150 150 MB/s
|
87.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$51
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
6.95%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples | 556x |
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 524x |
Core i7-5960XIntel $235Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 467x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 216x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 197x |
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples | 120x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Good | Total price: $890 |