Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics73.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 07:37
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
SC Int 111
SC Float 129
SC Mixed 131
99% 124 Pts
QC Int 498
QC Float 509
QC Mixed 509
114% 505 Pts
MC Int 960
MC Float 1,043
MC Mixed 1,025
151% 1,009 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
73.7% Very good
Lighting 212
Reflection 216
Parallax 248
70% 225 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 218
Splatting 150
77% 178 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 87%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 281 257 293 283 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 434
Mixed 382
SusWrite 286
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 65
4K Mixed 39.3
137% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 41.9
93% 191 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 123%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 164 164 167 167 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 162
Mixed 97.5
SusWrite 164
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 111%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$120
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 147 148 151 150 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 158
Write 157
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 148
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$124
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
6.95% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 1.3
MC Mixed 1.1
3% 1.2 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 1.3
4% 1.4 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 6.95%
Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 3,315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $2,154
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $345Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $350AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $148SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback