Asus M4N72-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus M4N72-E  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110414
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 07:20
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Phenom II X4 920
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
37.7% Below average
SC Int 67.4
SC Float 40.6
SC Mixed 50.3
42% 52.8 Pts
QC Int 269
QC Float 161
QC Mixed 199
48% 210 Pts
MC Int 257
MC Float 162
MC Mixed 200
31% 206 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB
CLim: 1045 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 22.5
Parallax 31.8
9% 27.5 fps
MRender 18.4
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 27.5
12% 27.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 74 93 90 64 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38% Below average
Read 194
Write 119
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 82.2
26% 119 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 16.3
67% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 35.3
DQ Mixed 47.6
51% 88.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 38%
Great: 76%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$81
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 91 99 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 120
Write 101
Mixed 83.8
SusWrite 98.7
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$92
300GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 97 95 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 96.5
Mixed 11
SusWrite 102
53% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.3
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 7.1
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 81.1
49% 81.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 48%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M4N72-E Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M4N72-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $144
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback