User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.1% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemRazer Blade Pro
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171110
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 07:16
Run Duration77 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
SC Int 95.9
SC Float 85.9
SC Mixed 101
75% 94.2 Pts
QC Int 343
QC Float 372
QC Mixed 360
81% 359 Pts
MC Int 502
MC Float 587
MC Mixed 560
82% 550 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 6754) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (59 fps cap detected)
22.1% Poor
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 59.4
18% 59.3 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 59.3
25% 59.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 132%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 3,047
Write 2,027
Mixed 1,006
445% 2,026 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 60.9
204% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 826
DQ Mixed 877
660% 883 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 344%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 27.5
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback