Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 39% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 59% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170615
Uptime	9.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '18 at 07:10
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	59%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 43.1 2-Core 77.3 38% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 144 8-Core 151 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 148 9% 148 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4849 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 11.4 Parallax 1.31 1% 4.67 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 2.65 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-128S3G 128GB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 92 93 97 96 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 391 Write 93 Mixed 134 SusWrite 94.2 39% 178 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 23.6 4K Mixed 15.3 51% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 95.8 DQ Mixed 94.1 73% 99.5 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 89%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 132 134 133 132 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 80.2 Write 116 Mixed 59.8 SusWrite 130 71% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.7 175% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FHD1 1x8GB 757 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	37.5% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 11.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 11.1 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 417 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Notebook N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	342x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	72x
Core i3-7100HIntelBench 56%, 141 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	246x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	107x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	64x

SSD
MX300 SATA M.2 275GBCrucial $42Bench 80%, 16,792 samples	22x
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	17x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	14x

RAM
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 40%, 1,974 samples	27x
GKE800SO102408-2400 2x8GBHynixBench 71%, 801 samples	23x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16