Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 05:45
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700K-$380
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
107% Outstanding
SC Int 132
SC Float 139
SC Mixed 136
108% 135 Pts
QC Int 513
QC Float 536
QC Mixed 522
119% 524 Pts
MC Int 990
MC Float 1,122
MC Mixed 1,073
159% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$323
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 274
Parallax 290
88% 282 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 258
Splatting 209
93% 217 fps
Poor: 82%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 110%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$145
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1394 1086 602 601 602 597 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 1,580
Write 1,973
Mixed 1,269
SusWrite 814
317% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 42.5
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 51.4
164% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 123
92% 123 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 170%
Great: 317%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$130
112GB free
Firmware: 526ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 125 124 123 127 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 368
Write 146
Mixed 185
SusWrite 125
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 49.6
4K Mixed 24.5
96% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 75.7
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 96.3
69% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 87%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$118
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
66.5% Good
Read 132
Write 115
Mixed 92
SusWrite 99.4
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 84%
WD My Book 25EE 6TB
4TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 156 157 160 160 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 161
Write 160
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 158
192% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
73.3% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 20.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 22.5
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 104%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $1,008
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $380Nvidia GTX 1070 $323Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $350AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $160
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback