Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150303
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 04:43
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
SC Int 106
SC Float 108
SC Mixed 87
80% 100 Pts
QC Int 418
QC Float 404
QC Mixed 415
94% 412 Pts
MC Int 782
MC Float 863
MC Mixed 861
125% 835 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Asus(1043 8518) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 411.70
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60% Good
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 211
Parallax 234
39% 170 fps
MRender 160
Gravity 215
Splatting 149
76% 175 fps
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 174 194 168 200 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 450
Write 335
Mixed 330
SusWrite 172
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 44.6
147% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 273
DQ Mixed 43.1
96% 198 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 123%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$120
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 72 110 150 166 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 176
Write 85.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 120
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 110%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$120
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 64 66 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 176
Write 74.3
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 64.3
69% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$125
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
MC Read 0.6
MC Write 0.6
MC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.57 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.5
2% 0.53 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 87%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 3,285 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $2,154
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback