Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardAsus Rampage Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 01:49
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$191
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
28% Poor
SC Int 58.1
SC Float 35
SC Mixed 44
37% 45.7 Pts
QC Int 180
QC Float 111
QC Mixed 135
32% 142 Pts
MC Int 215
MC Float 120
MC Mixed 146
24% 160 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Lighting 216
Reflection 207
Parallax 247
70% 223 fps
MRender 155
Gravity 212
Splatting 146
74% 171 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 87%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 92 93 90 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 125
Write 112
Mixed 115
SusWrite 90.4
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 26.3
85% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 31.1
30% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$130
19GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 75 71 76 71 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 101
Write 51.5
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 72.3
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 62%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$90
251GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 79
Mixed 51.2
50% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.2 3.3 2.8 3.2 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 15
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 3.2
12% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 8%
WD Elements 107C 5TB
176GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 26 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 27.5
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 26.9
38% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.5
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 46%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $380Nvidia GTX 1070 $323Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $98
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $157SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback