Asus Rampage Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Rampage Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 01:49
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9300-$38
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 35
2-Core 69.1
38% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 121
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 120
7% 120 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.8% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 79.6
Parallax 77.1
59% 76.2 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 63.5
56% 69.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 92 93 90 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 125
Write 112
Mixed 115
SusWrite 90.4
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 26.3
85% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 31.1
30% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
19GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 75 71 76 71 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 101
Write 51.5
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 72.3
52% 69.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 62%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
251GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 79
Mixed 51.2
50% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
4GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.2 3.3 2.8 3.2 3.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
4.21% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 15
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 3.2
12% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.21%
Great: 8%
WD Elements 107C 5TB
176GB free, PID 107c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 26 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 27.5
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 26.9
38% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.5
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage Formula Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Rampage Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $248
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback