Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory15.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 01:49
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 58.5
2-Core 95.1
52% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 378
38% 309 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
XFX(1682 3260) 2GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 18% Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 72 75 76 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 81.7
Write 86.3
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 72.6
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
161% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
156GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 60 62 62 62 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 77.3
Write 78
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 61.8
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
752GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 128 129 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 110
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 128
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
109GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 72 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 72.6
64% 87 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 69%
SDHC Card 16GB
15GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 12 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 34.2
Write 12.5
Mixed 16
SusWrite 11.9
22% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.5
157% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX Adata 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 12.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback