User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170110
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateOct 12 '18 at 01:41
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 100
2-Core 183
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 519
53% 429 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 6755) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4836
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.42% Terrible
Lighting 7.77
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 7.66
6% 8.99 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7
Splatting 15.4
10% 11.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.42%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 195 172 182 176 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 908
Write 277
Mixed 288
SusWrite 186
91% 415 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 34.1
163% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 953
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 380
340% 535 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 123%
Great: 144%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.7% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 24.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 23.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback