Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180820
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '18 at 01:31
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 74.4 1-Core 113 2-Core 209 74% 132 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 786 70% 590 Pts	64-Core 1083 67% 1083 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 240 58,337 User benchmarks, average bench 5% XFX(1682 7240) 2GB CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.5.1 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6% Terrible	Lighting 7.37 Reflection 8.88 Parallax 9.09 6% 8.45 fps	MRender 7.24 Gravity 6.33 Splatting 8.09 6% 7.22 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 137 136 135 225 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	55% Above average	Read 310 Write 105 Mixed 204 SusWrite 167 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 45.9 4K Mixed 24.6 99% 32.9 MB/s	DQ Read 51.9 DQ Write 54.8 DQ Mixed 48.9 38% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 85%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$80 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 291GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 105 107 106 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 104 Write 96.8 Mixed 64.1 SusWrite 105 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 58%
Mass Storage Device 500GB 5,742 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 211GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 37 37 36 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 33.9 Write 24.2 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 36.7 41% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 13.7 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 91.6 44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF B350M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	56x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	34x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	26x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	8x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	7x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $38Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 105% - Outstanding

Total price: $293

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16