| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 34.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-CS/BR (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180329 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 11 '18 at 21:56 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70%
Good
|
71% 128 Pts
|
53% 393 Pts
|
24% 392 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.16
|
34.4%
Below average
|
36% 35.1 fps
|
31% 38.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 72 76 73 78 71 MB/s
|
64%
Good
|
43% 189 MB/s
|
120% 44.8 MB/s
|
165% 247 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
171GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 116 113 111 114 112 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
64% 89.1 MB/s
|
120% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
66.7%
Good
|
69% 24.2 GB/s
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
41% 97.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 660 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 251x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 99x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 90x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 131x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 96x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 46x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $240 |