MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B77
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 11 '18 at 21:25
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$290
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
SC Int 116
SC Float 125
SC Mixed 121
96% 121 Pts
QC Int 441
QC Float 493
QC Mixed 456
105% 463 Pts
MC Int 1,306
MC Float 1,351
MC Mixed 1,342
200% 1,333 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$134
Asus(1043 04BE) ≥ 4GB; ASUS ROG-STRIX-RX560-O4G-GAMING Radeon RX 560 4 GB GDDR5
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 86
Parallax 132
34% 106 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 94.4
Splatting 81.5
35% 81.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$135
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 707 586 584 596 609 608 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2387
Write 2,158
Mixed 1,513
SusWrite 615
372% 1,668 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 75
247% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,067
DQ Write 721
DQ Mixed 937
688% 908 MB/s
Poor: 187%
This bench: 250%
Great: 321%
AMD T00 StoreMI 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 178 175 175 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 139
Write 142
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 175
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 90%
Great: 106%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
782GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 170 167 170 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 175
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 170
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 106%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
886GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 103 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 102
116% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 50%
StoreJet Transcend 750GB
489GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 41.7
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 42.1
48% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 27.7
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 25.8
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 123%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) Builds (Compare 515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 133%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $1,286
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback