| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ R3.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160111 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 11 '18 at 18:34 |
| Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 100% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
33.8%
Below average
|
30% 41.5 Pts
|
8% 63 Pts
|
4% 64.7 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 460-$90
CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
16% 22.5 fps
|
20% 23.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 177 160 182 191 177 MB/s
|
93.8%
Outstanding
|
99% 136 MB/s
|
144% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905584-029.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
11% 3.9 GB/s
|
7% 2.53 GB/s
|
31% 130 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical FM2A88M-HD+ R3.0 Builds (Compare 47 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M-HD+ R3.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 8x |
| A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 6x |
| Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 5x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 4x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 15% - Very poor | Total price: $25 |