Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 97 2-Core 169 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 286 8-Core 472 46% 379 Pts	64-Core 470 29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AD5) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.26% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 1.77 Parallax 1.19 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 2.29 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 2.48 2% 1.91 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.26% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 139GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 456 466 447 318 318 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	97.5% Outstanding	Read 468 Write 450 Mixed 434 SusWrite 410 99% 440 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 37.3 119% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 364 274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 97.5% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F 2x4GB 478 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	3x
Radeon HD 7570AMDBench 5%, 12,360 samples	3x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	2x
64C0MHHHJ-HS Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 01BA 64C0MHHHJ-HS Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GBUnknownBench 49%, 6 samples	2x
YXS1866C10D3/8G 4x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 244 samples	2x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $283

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16