Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	43.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 EVO (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1216 x 684 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 11 '18 at 14:32
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	63%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 92.6 1-Core 97.1 2-Core 194 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 455 48% 383 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 8598) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2122 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 411.70 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.7% Average	Lighting 49.3 Reflection 57.5 Parallax 46.4 40% 51.1 fps	MRender 70.3 Gravity 49.8 Splatting 64.9 51% 61.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,411 Write 4,548 Mixed 5,132 1,122% 5030 MB/s	4K Read 320 4K Write 199 4K Mixed 193 838% 238 MB/s	DQ Read 811 DQ Write 616 DQ Mixed 649 503% 692 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 62GB free Firmware: JP4OA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 78 78 78 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 109 Write 109 Mixed 55.3 SusWrite 77.1 64% 87.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 74%
WD Elements 500GB 10,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 26GB free, PID 1042 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 79 77 80 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	32.3% Below average	Read 79 Write 78.5 Mixed 52 SusWrite 81.2 98% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 32.3% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-447.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 9905403-447.A00LF 9905403-181.A00LF 16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	47.8% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 15 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.6 SC Write 16.9 SC Mixed 15.9 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 597 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	236x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	125x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	79x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	38x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	28x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	23x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	22x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16