Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive384% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 11 '18 at 10:25
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 98.5
1-Core 157
2-Core 315
104% 190 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 844
91% 722 Pts
64-Core 850
53% 850 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 105%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 165
Parallax 152
127% 158 fps
MRender 122
Gravity 148
Splatting 120
106% 130 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 116%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2187 2186 2155 2140 2111 2126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 2514
Write 2,120
Mixed 1,407
SusWrite 2,151
459% 2,048 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 197
4K Mixed 90.1
315% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,349
DQ Write 1,109
DQ Mixed 1,198
905% 1,218 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 384%
Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
241GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 468 467 470 435 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 469
Write 457
Mixed 426
SusWrite 431
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 63.9
214% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 128%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
466GB free
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2179 677 623 625 624 622 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
317% Outstanding
Read 2,479
Write 2,152
Mixed 1435
SusWrite 891
388% 1,740 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 99.1
335% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,430
DQ Write 1,252
DQ Mixed 1,314
992% 1,332 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 317%
Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
931GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 467 466 469 464 458 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 456
Mixed 421
SusWrite 464
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 63.4
211% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 350
266% 359 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 192 193 193 193 194 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 150
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 190
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB-$82
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3708 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 30
111% 39 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 35.2
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 43.7
92% 43.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 111%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,213
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback