Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320M-HD2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170407
Uptime	9 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '18 at 17:30
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	55%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100 83,528 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 81.5 2-Core 145 55% 95.8 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 248 30% 230 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AC) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.7% Average	Lighting 65.4 Reflection 70.4 Parallax 70.6 53% 68.8 fps	MRender 67.3 Gravity 67.2 Splatting 5.22 34% 46.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$80 26,761 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 92 53 88 57 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	Read 301 Write 142 Mixed 147 SusWrite 81.5 37% 168 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 24.6 4K Mixed 9.5 40% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 240 172% 224 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 530GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.3 1.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 133 Write 6 Mixed 20.5 SusWrite 1.5 29% 40.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBD2 1x8GB 2,010 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	39% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 14.2 40% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 11.1 SC Mixed 11.2 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	36x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	23x
Ryzen 3 1300XAMD $102Bench 65%, 38,959 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	18x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	6x
2666 C16 Series 2x4GBUnknownBench 77%, 3,759 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16